A Few Helpful Resources on the Text of the Hebrew Bible/LXX

In my review of T. Michael Law’s book  When God Spoke Greek: The Septuagint and the Making of the Christian Bible (see here), I posed a couple of questions that, in my humble opinion, would increase the value of the book as an introductory work. I have been asked what other resources I would recommend alongside Law’s book to provide a “fuller perspective.”

Again, these simply are my suggestions as a reader. Certainly one book cannot do everything, but I know what is helpful to me when I explore unfamiliar territory. The resources below are in relation to the specific points of my review. All but the fourth resource(s) are found in Law’s “Further Reading” section on pages 201-12, which itself is worth the cost of the book.

I confess at the outset that Law is the expert here. He is in a far better position to give book recommendations in Septuagint studies. Nonetheless, here are a few sources that may provide a more balanced perspective.

1. Robert Hanhart, “Introduction,” in The Septuagint as Christian Scripture: Its Prehistory and the Problem of Its Canon, by Martin Hengel (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2004), 1–17.

Comment: Interestingly, Hanhart presents a different perspective than Hengel on the problems in the history of the text of the LXX. In fact, it was for this divergent view that he was asked by Hengel to write the introduction. Though his remarks are brief, readers can hear another take on the problem.

2. Nora David et al., eds., The Hebrew Bible in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Forschungen Zur Religion Und Literatur Des Alten Und Neuen Testaments 239 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012).

Comment: Though a more technical work, this book consists of 4 parts assessing the impact of the Dead Sea Scrolls on the study of the Hebrew Bible. Part 1 is further subdivided into five essays labeled “General Studies” and four essays as “Case Studies.” The “General Studies” section represents two views: one emphasizing textual plurality in early Judaism, and the other articulating a greater degree of continuity with the later Masoretic Text. The existence of the volume is evidence that the conversation is slightly more nuanced than one may be led to believe by Law’s book.

3. Lee Martin McDonald and James A. Sanders, eds., The Canon Debate (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002).

Comment: This book incorporates 32 essays addressing a range of issues in both Hebrew Bible and New Testament scholarship. While many contributors of “The Old/First Testament Canon” section would side with Law, I appreciate their attempt to clarify terms and concepts. Understanding what an author means by “canon” or “Bible,” even if one disagrees, opens the door to a clearer discussion.

4. Peter J. Gentry, “The Septuagint and the Text of the Old Testament,” Bulletin for Biblical Research 16, no. 2 (2006): 193–218. See also Peter J. Gentry, “The Text of the Old Testament,” JETS 52, no. 1 (March 2009): 19–45.

Comment: These two articles, written from an evangelical perspective, stand at the other end of the spectrum. Gentry is a specialist in the Septuagint, and here assesses the value of the LXX, as well as methodological considerations for its study.

Advertisements

15 Comments

Filed under OT Resources, Septuagint

15 responses to “A Few Helpful Resources on the Text of the Hebrew Bible/LXX

  1. Jim

    you missed the best of the lot- mogens muller’s book on the lxx

  2. Thanks for highlighting these resources!

  3. Good recommendations, Andrew. I would add Tov’s third edition of his work on textual criticism and I would still recommend that folks read Roger Beckwith’s The Old Testament Canon for the New Testament Church. The former promotes the continuity view and the latter is still the most solid work on the OT canon to date.

  4. Thanks John for the recommendation! I agree, Tov’s Text. Crit. is helpful. His essay in my second recommendation provides a succinct argument for continuity with MT as well.

    I would love to hear any more that you have found helpful as a specialist.

  5. Naturally, you’d not be surprised that I’d say Beckwith’s is one of the worst 🙂

    • Hi Michael,

      Honest question here. Would you point me to a solid critique of Beckwith’s monograph? In one of your endnotes, you cited his article in Mikra and made some general comment about its problematic reconstruction but did not provide any specifics (which would have been out of the scope of your work I realize).

  6. But you also have to read carefully Tov’s whole book, because one develops different impressions elsewhere. Plus, during the course of a few beers in Göttingen, he’s been heard saying otherwise. 🙂

  7. Pingback: Resources on the text of the Hebrew Bible/LXX | NEAR EMMAUS

  8. John, I don’t know whether TML has replied to you already, but to answer the question in your blog comment here, he has just today posted a critique (on his blog) of Beckwith.

  9. Will respond about Tov soon. It’s been a busy week, but basically this is a misreading of Tov.

  10. Pingback: Words on the Word | Septuagint Studies Soirée #1

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s